|
Welcome to a brand of
Mathematical
Services. 2025-11-10 12:39:06 - Paul D. Foy - OnMakingAComment Given the latest scandal regarding the news reporting of President Trump's disparate comments, I thought I should give some guidelines as to the interpretation of my comments and posts. Firstly it has to be said that my verbal utterances are generally of my profundity than a large series of comments. This is because they are generally sorter, and the first utterances themselves amongst a statement probably of more significance. An exception to this is when I've said something stupid because I have been upset or provoked and didn't have the time to calmly reflect on the situation. Thus agian the context is very important. When it comes to the written word, the length and diversity of my comments is far greater so the interpretaion is far more difficult. I do take seriously the comments I make and stand by them but context is key. Firsly if a comments is made within a series of other people's comments (such as in LinkedIn or Facebook) then if it appears odd then there must be some caution. This is because other people may remove or alter their comments, making mine appear to be wrong or out of context. I would say a solid body of my comments can be more relid upon. Also sites were there is more control of my comments by myself (such as this) are generally more coherant and reliable. strangly I actually find that some of the pornographic sites and applications allow one to express oneself quite well and without interference (even when considering the subject matter of some of the comments). When piecing together my attitude or opinion from several seperate sources I would hope this is reasonably consistent, yet agian each comment must first and foremost be viewed in the context to where it was made because the comment was addressing this context. This is generally a situation where verbal affirmation from myself would help, as the verbal word can quickly and succintly sum up a situation. Post a comment: |